> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://help.jurisphere.ai/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://help.jurisphere.ai/resources/prompting-guide/prompt-library.md).
# Prompt Library
## Prompt Enhancement:
***
Get better results faster with Jurisphere’s new **Prompt Enhancement** feature. Instead of spending time drafting the perfect query, let the AI optimise it for you.
#### How it Works:
1. Type your initial query into the chat box.
2. Press the Tab key on your keyboard before hitting submit.
3. The AI will instantly restructure and enhance your prompt for the best possible output.
***
To help you get started, we have categorized several practical examples below to show how different levels of prompt detail can change your output. You can use these as inspiration or let the Prompt Enhancement feature upgrade your text automatically.
***
## Simple prompts
Use short, specific instructions when you need quick answers or summaries.
1. *“Summarize this judgment in one paragraph.”*
2. *“List all parties mentioned in the agreement.”*
3. *“Extract all dates referenced in this pleading.”*
4. *“What is the primary legal issue in this case?”*
5. *“Explain the court’s final decision.”*
6. *“Provide the definition of ‘commodity’ as used in this agreement."*
## Expanded Prompts
Provide more context or structure for tasks that require focused or organized outputs.
1. *“Summarize the key arguments made by Party B in this pleading, and identify the supporting legal
precedents cited.”*
2. *“Create a bulleted list of all rights and obligations outlined in this service agreement.”*
3. *“Identify the clauses in the Supply Agreement that are relevant to the dispute raised in the Legal
Notice.”*
4. *“Extract all references to statutory requirements in this compliance report and summarize them in a
table.”*
5. *“Compare the timelines provided in the contract with the timelines mentioned in the notice of
termination.”*
6. *“List all claims for damages made in this document, with specific amounts mentioned.”*
7. *“Identify any procedural irregularities mentioned in this arbitration award and list them in order of
significance.”*
8. *“What are the key differences in the scope of confidentiality obligations between the two NDAs?”*
9. *“Summarize the rules of interpretation applied by the court in this judgment.”*
10. *“Create a table comparing the grounds of appeal raised in two different cases provided in the
selected judgments.”*
11. *“List all obligations of Party A under the agreement, with page references from the document.”*
12. *“Compare the key provisions in the two selected agreements related to termination clauses.”*
13. *“Identify and explain any inconsistencies between the claims and supporting evidence in this
pleading.”*
14. *“Create a table listing all annexures in the document with their descriptions and relevance to the
case.”*
15. *“Explain the reasoning of the court in this judgment in 2-3 concise paragraphs, focusing on key
arguments.”*
16. *“From the judgment, identify the ratio decidendi and obiter dicta. Provide a separate analysis of
how each part contributes to the overall outcome of the case.”*
17. *“Analyze the liability clauses in the selected contracts. Compare their scope and limitations in
tabular format, including references to relevant sections.”*
## Advanced Prompts
Use detailed prompts when tackling complex legal tasks that require analytical insights or specific
\
formats.
1. *“Analyze this arbitration award concerning a construction dispute between Party A and Party B.
Highlight whether the award complies with the principles of natural justice, focusing specifically on
procedural fairness and adherence to the terms of the contract. Conclude with recommendations
on what grounds it can be challenged in court.”*
2. *“Draft a response to this legal notice alleging breach of contract. The contract in question is a
supply agreement dated January 10, 2023, and the notice claims a shortfall in deliveries. Base the
response on the terms of Clause 6 (Force Majeure) and Clause 12 (Dispute Resolution), arguing
that the delay was caused by unforeseen port strikes. Provide headings for the main arguments
and a summary of the proposed resolution at the end.”*
3. *“Evaluate the evidentiary strength of the annexures attached to this statement of defense. Identify
which annexures substantiate the arguments raised and which ones appear weak or irrelevant.
Provide suggestions for additional evidence that may strengthen the defense’s case.”*
4. *“Compare the indemnity clauses in these two agreements. Agreement 1 is a franchise contract
governed by Indian law, and Agreement 2 is a distribution agreement governed by Singapore law.
Provide a table summarizing their scope, triggers, limitations, and exclusions, followed by a
narrative section analyzing which clause offers broader protection to the indemnified party.”*
5. *"Prepare a briefing note on the dispute between ABC Ltd. and DEF Pvt. Ltd. Summarize the key
arguments from all documents, identify the legal issues, and propose a strategy for ABC Ltd. to
defend against the termination notice. Format the note with bold headings and include inline
references to specific pages and sections.*
6. *“Analyze the contradictions between the purchase order and the invoice attached to this contract
dispute. Highlight discrepancies in quantities, pricing, or terms of delivery in a tabular format. Also
provide an assessment of how these contradictions may impact the respondent’s claims.”*
7. *"Prepare a note summarizing the main arguments raised in these pleadings and supporting
documents. Focus on the arguments that are most likely to succeed in court and reference specific
paragraphs and exhibits to substantiate the analysis. Conclude with a summary of the likely
outcomes based on the arguments made.*
***
## Read more:
To learn more about how Generative AI responds to prompting techniques, you can refer to:
---
# Agent Instructions
This documentation is published with GitBook. GitBook is the documentation platform designed so that both humans and AI agents can read, navigate, and reason over technical content effectively. Learn more at gitbook.com.
## Querying This Documentation
If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.
Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter, and the optional `goal` query parameter:
```
GET https://help.jurisphere.ai/resources/prompting-guide/prompt-library.md?ask=&goal=
```
`ask` is the immediate question: it should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
`goal` is optional and describes the broader end goal you are ultimately trying to accomplish on behalf of the user. GitBook uses it to tailor the answer towards what is most useful for that goal.
The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.
Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.